Godwin’s Law And Crooked Scientists 3

Godwin’s Law is more of a rule than a law, and was first postulated by a guy named Mike Godwin, an attorney and author. It is a rule that speaks to communications on the internet, and the inevitable outcome of those that devolve into intractable arguments.

It goes something like this (paraphrase): As any internet conversation grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.

For those of you who are not familiar with the math of statistics, when the probability of something approaches 1 (one), that event will happen. It will definitely happen.

It helps to understand why this happens. The person invoking the Nazi defense has run out of facts, and is losing the argument. Frustrated, out foxed, and out of facts, this person starts the ad hominem show, and immediately goes for the deepest insult in Western Civilization, the “You are a Nazi” meme. A fresh instance of Godwin’s Law will have been initiated.

The most blatant example of instantiation of Godwin’s Law is from global warming advocates. Their primary arguments depend on a so-called consensus of opinion in the scientific community. This is known as an argument from authority which carries no weight in science.

Global warming advocates have run out of scientific facts. There is no empiricle science that suggests drastic rises in sea levels, increased occurrences of natural disasters, or any catastrophe related to climate change. Once you get past the basic physics of carbon dioxide, the game is over.

Climate skeptics do not argue the basics of carbon dioxide induced global warming, they say that CO2 global warming is real, but not a big deal.

The Catastrophic Global Warming advocates have no science, and have therefore Christened climate change skeptics as deniers, as in Holocaust Deniers. This is a direct comparison of climate skeptics to Nazis.

How about that. Climate change advocates, being out of facts or credible science, are instantiating Godwin’s Law, i,e., comparing those skeptical to catastrophic climate change to Nazis.

Recently, a well-known and nasty advocate of climate change catastrophe, Dr Peter Gleick, committed a crime by impersonating someone else to obtain some records from the Heartland Institute, a libertarian think tank, coincidentally skeptical towards Gleick’s pet theories. Get the whole story at Watts Up With That. Gleick is out of facts, doesn’t understand the science, and was made to look silly in a recent series of articles.

This should tell you something. The Catastrophic Climate guys can’t take it. They are calling skeptics deniers, and frustrated advocates are committing crimes to find something, ANYTHING, to help their outmoded and failed cause.

Godwin’s Law rides, again.

Hat Tip:  Climate Science: Dr Roger Pielke, Sr.

Advertisements

3 comments

  1. “They are calling skeptics deniers, and frustrated advocates are committing crimes to find something, ANYTHING, to help their outmoded and failed cause.”

    Ghandi said “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” I think we are at the ‘then you win” stage right about now.

    You know, I’ve been called a denier on many occuasions and I’ve never associated it with holocaust denial. I’ve always felt beng called ‘denier’ was like being called ‘blasphemer’.

  2. Our most recent example of proof of the hysteria and bald-faced lies of the warmists is the recent rains we’ve been experiencing in the last week. Our chief climate warmist told us shrilly that rain would be a thing of the past, our dams would dry up and the seas would swamp us.

    Since then he himself bought a house on the beach and the rains started again last year and it hasn’t stopped raining. Our dams are over flowing and parts of the country are under water. Naturally the warmists are claiming that it’s all because of global warming too. Even if they are true, they do their side no favors because to the common man it seems, whether it’s hot or cold, raining or drought, we’re always to blame and it’s almost always a tax of some sort that’s the remedy.

    The climate is changing, but i’m pretty sure that it’s not us humans who are changing it, even the warmists have to accept it because everything they propose that we humans do to stop it from changing is very thin on actual results.

  3. They claim everything bad is because of “climate change”. Yet, they never have a shred of scientific backup for their stories, just that we need to be taxed because of our sins. How stupid!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s